Longshot for Wednesday
 

You have guts if you can bet a horse from post 7 at Buffalo. The win percentage is 5.6, pretty much an industry standard now. But Buffalo has a terrible inside bias, post 1 wins at 27%, which should be unaccepetable. If I was the GM or director of racing at Buffalo, I would not allow that type of bias, I would figure out how to change it.

buf has one of the better sites of the smaller tracks and a great vidieo also. but the % of winning favs is too high for me .by the way arent the worst horses supposed to be placed to the inside if so then rays horse should have a better chance than its post suggests happy handicapping :headbanger:

46% winning favorites, terrible...Monticello is 50%!...Northfield is 47%.

It's ashame how they killed half mile track racing.

i think the tracks mgment is part to blame they would rather see the odds on favs. meaning more winners and more churn for them but the bottom line it comes from the owners of said tracks an most of them are casino minded only !

I wish tracks would post ROI data for Drivers / Trainers / and Post Positions
Statsmaster at Trackmaster has ROIs for DR/TR but not post.

Here's what I have for Buffalo last year, not official.

thanks ray for the post chart using that i grabed a 30-1 shot there seeing that the roi on the 4 was in the plus side thanks sir love those charts gl capping :headbanger:

Glad you got it, sharkey!:headbanger:

10 race super was $1.00 . . 8-5-4-2 $9,569.00, and somebody had it.:eek:

At NFLD.....Wrenn and Merriman probably drive at least 80% of those winning favorites too. Is there an imbalance of driver talent there? Are those two that much better than the rest? When they drive elsewhere, they don't stand out.

They're talented. Merriman does very well at the Meadows and now Wrenn is starting to make inroads at the Meadows. I think he won five races there one day last week. I'm a big fan of Wrenn, he has a lot of ability.