Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Off Topic - General (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Big Breakthrough-Transparent Solar Panels (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=141486)

ReplayRandall 10-24-2017 12:07 PM

Big Breakthrough-Transparent Solar Panels
 
A new generation of see-through solar cell technology could soon be used to harvest the massive energy potential of building and car windows, cell phones as well as other objects with a transparent surface.

The system uses materials to pick up ultraviolet and near infrared wavelengths, which are guided to the edge of the surface they are on for it to be converted into electricity by thin strips of photovoltaic solar cells.

http://www.newsweek.com/fossil-fuels...ows-msu-691308

chadk66 10-24-2017 01:09 PM

problem with solar is it takes lots of petroleum to build it. and you have major toxic elements to deal with when they are done.

TBD 10-25-2017 04:22 AM

Cost per therm vs. conventional and storage, is and has been the main problems for renewable energy. I enjoyed where the article came to the big if on storage. Sound like someone needs a new grant.

Augenj 10-25-2017 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReplayRandall (Post 2234185)
A new generation of see-through solar cell technology could soon be used to harvest the massive energy potential of building and car windows, cell phones as well as other objects with a transparent surface.

The system uses materials to pick up ultraviolet and near infrared wavelengths, which are guided to the edge of the surface they are on for it to be converted into electricity by thin strips of photovoltaic solar cells.

http://www.newsweek.com/fossil-fuels...ows-msu-691308

Oh, no. I'd much rather have coal creating our electricity. (kidding) :D

FantasticDan 01-21-2018 11:42 AM


davew 01-21-2018 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chadk66 (Post 2234210)
problem with solar is it takes lots of petroleum to build it. and you have major toxic elements to deal with when they are done.

That is not a problem, because you can make, recycle, and destroy on the other side of the world, like in China. Out of sight, out of mind. This is a great scientific breakthrough.

Tom 01-21-2018 04:14 PM

If they beat coal, they would be in mass production everywhere.
The only test of if they are a viable option is that business are making them.

hcap 01-21-2018 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom (Post 2264373)
If they beat coal, they would be in mass production everywhere.
The only test of if they are a viable option is that business are making them.

Solar power growth leaps by 50% worldwide thanks to US and China

https://www.theguardian.com/environm...hina-uk-europe

davew 01-21-2018 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom (Post 2264373)
If they beat coal, they would be in mass production everywhere.
The only test of if they are a viable option is that business are making them.

They need 'subsidized' until the technology gets cost effective

Tom 01-21-2018 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hcap (Post 2264412)
Solar power growth leaps by 50% worldwide thanks to US and China

https://www.theguardian.com/environm...hina-uk-europe

If that comes from government regulation, it is BS.
If it comes from greedy capitalist doing it, it is good.
What are you so bitter theses days?

I never said SP was bad, just forcing it.
I like the idea and fully support the decision to use it, based 100% on the market.

hcap 01-22-2018 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom (Post 2264477)
If that comes from government regulation, it is BS.
If it comes from greedy capitalist doing it, it is good.
What are you so bitter theses days?

I never said SP was bad, just forcing it.
I like the idea and fully support the decision to use it, based 100% on the market.

BTW, Ouil and coal are sdubsidized

SEIA is the national trade association for the U.S. solar .




https://www.seia.org/solar-industry-data

http://www.seia.org/sites/default/fi...TC-2017YIR.png

hcap 01-22-2018 12:11 AM

http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/24/news...oal/index.html

Solar jobs growing 17 times faster than US economy

Tom 01-22-2018 12:38 PM

So go buy stock.

Actor 01-22-2018 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davew (Post 2264429)
They need 'subsidized' until the technology gets cost effective

Right now the problem with solar is storing the energy until it is needed. Batteries are simply not efficient enough. A few years back I attended a lecture where the speaker proposed that the energy be used to extract hydrogen from water. The hydrogen could then be stored until used as fuel. It could be distributed through existing pipe lines. The problem is that not many vehicles use natural gas powered engines.

However, when you burn gasoline in an engine you get carbon dioxide and water. If solar energy (electricity) could be used to force the process in reverse then from carbon dioxide and water you could produce gasoline. I asked a chemistry student if this could be done and he said "Funny you should mention that. I know some grad students who are working on it."

That's an ideal solution. Not only would we be using solar to produce gasoline but we'd be sucking carbon dioxide, the major greenhouse gas, out of the atmosphere as well, killing two birds with one stone: cheap energy plus an end to global warming. I sounds too good to be true so it probably won't work, dammit.

zico20 01-23-2018 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Actor (Post 2264960)
Right now the problem with solar is storing the energy until it is needed. Batteries are simply not efficient enough. A few years back I attended a lecture where the speaker proposed that the energy be used to extract hydrogen from water. The hydrogen could then be stored until used as fuel. It could be distributed through existing pipe lines. The problem is that not many vehicles use natural gas powered engines.

However, when you burn gasoline in an engine you get carbon dioxide and water. If solar energy (electricity) could be used to force the process in reverse then from carbon dioxide and water you could produce gasoline. I asked a chemistry student if this could be done and he said "Funny you should mention that. I know some grad students who are working on it."

That's an ideal solution. Not only would we be using solar to produce gasoline but we'd be sucking carbon dioxide, the major greenhouse gas, out of the atmosphere as well, killing two birds with one stone: cheap energy plus an end to global warming. I sounds too good to be true so it probably won't work, dammit.

Can't have an end to the global warming scam, too many liberals are making too much money off of it. Not to mention all those third world countries are relying on the modernized countries to subsidize their economies.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.