Quote:
Originally Posted by formula_2002
He looked at all favorites, 6o88 races. He looked at 1478 system favorites and had successful z scores of 2.5 for 4 of the 6 incremental odd sets.
Benter's paper looked at 3198 races and as far as I can determined never produced a similar table of his system plays.
|
And which guy made more money?
Your relentless pursuit of nothingness and then inserting your misguided "analysis" in too many threads is well beyond annoying at this point. And responses by respected members like sjk carry way more weight than any of your pseudo-statistical posts.
