Sidebar

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Wait. Wait. Wait.

10 instances of POSSIBLE obstruction.

Wasn't Mueller's whole job to determine a)whether or not there was collusion with Russia (then when they discovered this was a fairytale, expand it to) b)obstruction of justice
No that was not his whole job.
From Rosenstein's authorization.
The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination bet ween the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a). (c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.


OK, let's say you're ok with the witch hunt. Fine.

If his entire job was to come up with SOMETHING, and all he could come up with were 10 POSSIBLE instances of "something"...how is his entire investigation not a TOTAL FAIL at this point?

His job was to investigate and come to CONCRETE conclusions on what he was investigating. Either there was OBSTRUCTION or there wasn't. There is no POSSIBLE here. HE WAS THE INVESTIGATOR.

It's his job to CONCLUDE there was a crime, if there was one. He doesn't have to indict, but he can certainly CONCLUDE in his REPORT that there is concrete evidence of A,B, and/or C. None of this "possible" bullshit.
Unlike Starr, Mueller respects the spirit of the DOJ opinion as well as the letter.

Again, he was the INVESTIGATOR. Who else is going to come along now and determine whether these fairytale "possibilities" are real or not? ANOTHER INVESTIGATOR?
We don't need another investigator. Mueller has plenty of evidence to open an impeachment inquiry in the House. What he does not have is the authority to present that evidence to Congress. As long as we have a corrupt Attorney General, Congress will never see the evidence gathered by Mueller.

The jury in this instance is CONGRESS. They need someone to bring along the EVIDENCE of the crime.

What about this doesn't sound totally ****ed up to you? Pretend his name isn't TRUMP for a minute. Maybe that might help.

OK, I'll bite. His name isn't Trump. Guess what? He still did what he did and he still is guilty.