Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
not rejecting it, just realizing it is not foolproof
and skeptical of papers that look like opinion pieces rather than science.
|
But what about all the scientific organizations I posted?
Name one accredited organization that rejects AGW. BTW, name one university that rejects AGW. There aren't any. In order for these organizations to be fooled by fraudulent papers, or"opinion pieces" the fraud must be gigantic.
I agree peer review can be wrong, but the degree of error is not enough to throw out the baby with the bathwater.
How would you know an opinion piece from an honest scientific paper? Consult maybe with boxcar who thinks effect can precede cause
