The way I look at E horses is they're one-way speed horses, if they aren't one-way then P should be part of it. I think it's safe to say a horse that passes three horses in the final eighth of a turf route is probably not a legit E horse but calling it a P horse I can see.
I think with my own stuff it comes down to a bit of a blend of what they 'are' from a low level look at individual races and also 'where' they can be expected to run from today looking at it from a high level with perhaps some weighting given to the larger body of races or maybe even more recent races. It's a lot of IF/then/else in my code and I think there are probably folks who can come to all different conclusions on styles.
Me personally, I would not want to be using a product that called this an E horse, with all due respect to BRIS as they generally have a pretty darn good product IMO.
Last edited by MJC922; 03-20-2024 at 12:06 PM.
|