Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost
I could not access that article without a Washington Post subscription, but I did see enough to know that while the headline says very, very good, the start of the article says "pretty good"
I also learned enough indirectly to know the article said very, very good compared to the first year of his predecessors, but not compared to recent trends.
What does Bump mean by predecessors? If he means Obama and Bush, well duh. Obama's first year was the middle of the worst recession in 80 years and Bush is Bush.
If we look at Trump's predecessors since Kennedy in 1961, we find that Trump stands right in the middle; behind Carter, Clinton, Nixon and Bush I, ahead of Kennedy, Reagan, Bush II and Obama.
in my previous post I detailed how Trump's job numbers compare with the past six years of the Obama administration. Short answer; they are not good.
|
You should be honest with yourself, not only today but your always way out of your depth. It seems like I hated Barack Hussein Obama when in fact it was nothing personal with him and we just hated you and your kind. The core of it we just do not want to pay like no moneys at all for your leftest causes. All I can say is you folks wanted civil war, you got it at the ballot box. A clueless guy like yourself just can't understand half of the country has had it up to our eyeballs with your crap and we intend to destroy you folks in several elections. Should my BS turn into reality I expect we'll still be kicking around here to more than rub it in.
