Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 12-01-2017, 08:24 PM   #4696
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnlgfnk View Post
That is, physical systems are indeterminate.
No. Determinacy only requires that something be measurable within limits. See M-W.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnlgfnk View Post
Yet, in your link...

https://www.math.utah.edu/~pa/math/q1.html

...what is addressed is the "specifically" Greek contribution, "specifically" the square root of 2. Dr. Alfeld is not adding, subtracting, etc., he is performing the specific function of extracting the square root of 2.
No. He is giving a proof. Extracting the square root is an algorithm for determining the value of the square root through recursive approximations which converge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnlgfnk View Post
Further, he enlists the specific function of logic to explain the math, a logic which must be formal and exacting, to be coherent.

If physical systems are indeterminate, or "fuzzy", how is such determinate thought above only physical?
  1. As I explained above, physical systems are not indeterminate.
  2. Mathematics is not physical. It is abstract.
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 12-01-2017, 11:56 PM   #4697
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Mathematically!?
Yes, mathematically!

Would you agree that logic is mathematical?
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 12:36 AM   #4698
dnlgfnk
Registered User
 
dnlgfnk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis suburb
Posts: 1,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
No. Determinacy only requires that something be measurable within limits. See M-W.
No. He is giving a proof. Extracting the square root is an algorithm for determining the value of the square root through recursive approximations which converge.

  1. As I explained above, physical systems are not indeterminate.
  2. Mathematics is not physical. It is abstract.
You recently stated that the universe is "fuzzy". So does quantum theory:

"Quantum mechanics is generally regarded as the physical theory that is our best candidate for a fundamental and universal description of the physical world...One striking aspect of the difference between classical and quantum physics is that whereas classical mechanics presupposes that exact simultaneous values can be assigned to all physical quantities, quantum mechanics denies this possibility"...

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-uncertainty/

Are all physical facts known in any physical system, however small?

"...the idea that even a liter of space contains an infinite number of points, that space can be stretched out indefinitely without anything bad happening, and that there are quantities in nature that can vary continuously...the measure problem"...

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cr.../#.WiI1tEqnGUk

And proofs are examples of formal thought. Dr. Alfeld used "mathematical notation, which has only one possible meaning" (determinate)...

https://books.google.com/books?id=6E...proofs&f=false
__________________
"I like to come here (Saratoga) every year to visit my money." ---Joe E. Lewis
dnlgfnk is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 09:48 AM   #4699
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
Yes, mathematically!

Would you agree that logic is mathematical?
No, I would not not. Mathematics is logical. Now, show me precisely how the example you gave violates the Law of Noncontradiction.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 10:01 AM   #4700
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
It depends on what "in the same sense" means.
Since the identical phrase, "in the same sense" is used in both examples, what difference does it make? Your focus should be on what words or phrases that are different in the two statements, e.g. to give you a little hint to help your fuzzy mind along --the verb "be" in one sentence and the verb "exist" in the other. Just sayin'.....
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru

Last edited by boxcar; 12-02-2017 at 10:02 AM.
boxcar is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 04:18 PM   #4701
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Quote:
Would you agree that logic is mathematical?
No, I would not not.
Why not?
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 04:28 PM   #4702
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
Why not?
Because math is grounded in logic, not the other way around.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 04:31 PM   #4703
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Since the identical phrase, "in the same sense" is used in both examples, what difference does it make?
Perhaps none, perhaps a great deal. I cannot judge without knowing precisely what it means.

All I know at this point is that someone thinks that some word in the original Greek translates as "to be" but not as "exist". Since I cannot read Greek I am not qualified to render an opinion.
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 04:35 PM   #4704
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Because math is grounded in logic, not the other way around.
What about Boolean Algebra, in which logical statements are written in mathematical notation?
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 04:40 PM   #4705
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Because math is grounded in logic, not the other way around.
How do you know it's not the other way around?
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 06:03 PM   #4706
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
How do you know it's not the other way around?
Because it's illogical? One must know how to think before dealing with abstractions.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 06:49 PM   #4707
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
Perhaps none, perhaps a great deal. I cannot judge without knowing precisely what it means.
Hah...poor baby -- not a enough cerebral fire power to figure this out? Tsk, tsk. Let me help you to think for yourself. If I were to state, Diane is and isn't my mother, would this necessarily be an incoherent statement, and why?

Quote:
All I know at this point is that someone thinks that some word in the original Greek translates as "to be" but not as "exist". Since I cannot read Greek I am not qualified to render an opinion.
Do you have being? Or are you a corpse?
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 09:10 PM   #4708
Greyfox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Because math is grounded in logic, not the other way around.
Exactly!
Greyfox is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 09:41 PM   #4709
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Because it's illogical?
Circulus in probando! Circular reasoning.
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 12-02-2017, 09:42 PM   #4710
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox View Post
Exactly!
How do you know?
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Closed Thread





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.