Cutting Down Factors or Handicapping Angles

[equusvates]

In Americanturf.com website, there is a page which lists 40 articles attributed to him. The 26th article identifies a pattern which has a high success rate. Success defined as in the money or beating expectations. As stated at the website, theses angles have been tweaked over the years. I am a programmer and have pop up’s that displays when horses fires any high success rate angle. Articles numbers 1, 2, 3 and 40 are also very good. As everyone knows, no single angle determines a horse race.

If time permits, next weekend i will post in selections page, all races which I downloaded, all Taulbot angles which have fired. Even if not a programmer, theses angles submits to pencil and paper. Currently the program spits out hundreds of pages in a pdf file. The file is bookmarked so browsing the file is like browsing a website. This way you can determine for yourself the utility of Taubot’s angles.

I have to modify the program for this task. I do not want to expose my A. I. .

[Dave Schwartz]

Originally Posted by ranchwest

What is Ray Talbot Angle #26?

I asked ChatGPT.

Ray Talbot Angle #26 involves a set of criteria to select horses with a good chance of winning at odds of 4-1 or greater.

Here's a summary of the angle:

• The horse must have finished within two lengths of the winner in its third race back, and this race should have occurred no more than 50 days ago.
  
• The finishing time of the horse in its last race must be as fast or faster than its time in the third race back.
  
• The horse should have shown early speed or made up ground in its last race, which must have been run within the last 21 days.
• The horse must be the only one in the race that meets all the above criteria.
  
• The odds for the horse should be 4-1 or higher.

This angle emphasizes the importance of recent form, speed, and value in betting selections. It's designed for those who can patiently wait for races that meet these specific conditions, optimizing the chances for profitable outcomes.





.

[ranchwest]

Thanks, Dave!

[Saratoga]

Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz

I asked ChatGPT.

Ray Talbot Angle #26 involves a set of criteria to select horses with a good chance of winning at odds of 4-1 or greater.

Here's a summary of the angle:

• The horse must have finished within two lengths of the winner in its third race back, and this race should have occurred no more than 50 days ago.
  
• The finishing time of the horse in its last race must be as fast or faster than its time in the third race back.
  
• The horse should have shown early speed or made up ground in its last race, which must have been run within the last 21 days.
• The horse must be the only one in the race that meets all the above criteria.
  
• The odds for the horse should be 4-1 or higher.

This angle emphasizes the importance of recent form, speed, and value in betting selections. It's designed for those who can patiently wait for races that meet these specific conditions, optimizing the chances for profitable outcomes.





.

Can this angle be ran vs back data?

[headhawg]

There's no reason why it couldn't be tested. The only problem is that the third bullet point is open to interpretation. Someone testing it would have to try different definitions of early speed and making up ground. Maybe the actual angle was more specific about those things and ChatGPT is just being vague on purpose. It wants to keep the angle to itself.

[denniswilliams]

Originally Posted by headhawg

There's no reason why it couldn't be tested. The only problem is that the third bullet point is open to interpretation. Someone testing it would have to try different definitions of early speed and making up ground. Maybe the actual angle was more specific about those things and ChatGPT is just being vague on purpose. It wants to keep the angle to itself.

https://www.americanturf.com/newslet...ow.cfm?id=5866