|
|
07-06-2009, 12:36 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 928
|
Quirin speed-point advantages
Hello members. Hopefully we're all counting up our profits from the holiday weekend when some of the money floating in the pools is less informed than normal. Back to the grind of a Monday card where all the money knows what it is doing.
At any rate, I was wondering if anybody has statistics on Quirin speed-point advantages, that is, ROI of horses with a 2-point, 3-point, 4-point, or more advantage over the remainder of the field. It would also seem more illuminating if the study were restricted to races in which the impact value of speed is the greatest. For example, the Brisnet track bias stats show the impact of speed on winning percentages. Thus, the study could reasonably be restricted to races in which Brisnet says that E runners have the highest IV (impact value) at the distance. Steve Klein also sells track speed-bias statistics, but he restricts his reports to a handful of tracks. His stats are good, but as I say, limited.
I'd also be interested in hearing if anyone out there is regularly working with pace figs, and if so, how you compare them to Quirin speed points. Are they more accurate in your opinion?? Most experts say they are not, but I am yet to read about a study which shows this to be true. I guess I should back up here and say that we are talking about the horse who has the best chance to establish a clear lead in a race at the pace call (sometimes referred to as "2p" or "E2"). We know through extensive published statistics from Klein that these horses routinely enjoy a positive ROI of over 100% in American dirt racing (this may extend to synth although I'm not sure).
All comments are welcome, even if, as they say, they are anecdotal.
Mark
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 01:18 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 313
|
Who is Steve Klein?
Which figures does he produce?
__________________
Keep yourself in the best company and your horses in the worst.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 01:51 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 928
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by matthewsiv
Who is Steve Klein?
Which figures does he produce?
|
Klein is a noted handicapping author. He has a web site at power of early speed.com which produces early-speed figures and track speed-bias statistics at about 6 North American tracks. He is associated with DRF and his major work on the subject is appropriately named "The Power of Early Speed."
Mark
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 02:06 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 313
|
Thanks for the information.
__________________
Keep yourself in the best company and your horses in the worst.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 02:19 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Owatonna, MN
Posts: 793
|
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 03:22 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: massapequa park ny
Posts: 2,164
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by markgoldie
Klein is a noted handicapping author. He has a web site at power of early speed.com which produces early-speed figures and track speed-bias statistics at about 6 North American tracks. He is associated with DRF and his major work on the subject is appropriately named "The Power of Early Speed."
Mark
|
I have his book and i was not impressed with it.His method takes into account field size,post position and early speed.His methods sometimes uncover a diamond in the rough but calculating every horses klein speed points is tiring and cumbersome.I have found that often times horses that show high speed in his system do not outrun others with more quirin speed points.I gave up using his method as i did not note any significant difference in selecting the early speed horse.The equation is complicated with about 8 steps.I do not use it any longer.I have found bris pace numbers to be just as effective in conjunction with their speed point calculations
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 03:44 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 928
|
MNslappy:
Thanks for the info. I believe I read that PDF file before. The breakout of advantage figures that they use is very general, only looking at horses that have 7 or 8 Quirin points in a field where no one else has more than 5. In many cases, this could lead to only a 2-point advantage, for example, if the qualifying horse had 7 points and another horse had 5. What I was more interested in is say, a breakout where a horse had a 5-point advantage over the field, followed by a 4-point advantage, 3-point, etc.
fmolf: I have the Klein book as well and I do not bother to run his figures. However, I will say this: If you look at how he sets up his speed point scale and how the Quirin scale is set up, Klein has definitely made some advancements. Since Quirin points are currently considered the "Gold Standard" in t-bred racing, it makes some sense that Klein's points should be more accurate.
I subscribe to his website where he says that he has made some improvements to his general method since the publication of the book. I have used his numbers (not bothering to calculate them on my own, which as you say is time-consuming and difficult) and I have found his numbers to be highly accurate. Currently, though, I am not using pace advantage as my major means of handicapping, but I was wondering if anyone had info on points vs. pace figs, etc.
Mark
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 03:53 PM
|
#8
|
BetMix User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Posts: 1,108
|
markgoldie:
Quote:
I'd also be interested in hearing if anyone out there is regularly working with pace figs, and if so, how you compare them to Quirin speed points. Are they more accurate in your opinion??
|
In my opinion: Randy Giles who puts out PaceAppraiser would be the consumate expert on this topic. Speed points and running style, if they are accurately formulated, are the best race projectors you can use.
You might want to visit his site at: www.PaceAppraiser.com. and write him.
He's also on Twitter.
I have had nothing but excellent experiences with his product.
P.S. - I am not related to Randy and have no financial interests in his products.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 04:09 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,300
|
I find that pace figs generally outperform speed points roi-wise. Here's what I have in my Q2 2008 database for dirt races at Monmouth which some might argue is generally a speed favoring surface:
First, just to get some perspective, here are all starters that I have for dirt races at MTH in Q2 2009:
Code:
query start: 7/6/2009 12:53:20 PM
query end: 7/6/2009 12:53:58 PM
elapsed time: 38 seconds
Data Window Settings:
Divisor = 999 Odds Cap: None
Dirt (All*) Distance: (All*) (From Index File: C:\2009\Q2_2009\pL_profile.txt)
Track: MTH
Data Summary Win Place Show
Mutuel Totals 2434.90 2478.40 2253.10
Bet -3360.00 -3360.00 -3360.00
Gain -925.10 -881.60 -1106.90
Wins 245 485 642
Plays 1680 1680 1680
PCT .1458 .2887 .3821
ROI 0.7247 0.7376 0.6706
Avg Mut 9.94 5.11 3.51
Next, here is the data broken out by a very simple pace fig evaluation - Bris E2 (Best of Last 10) or simply Best E2:
Code:
By: Best E2 Rank
Rank Gain Bet Roi Wins Plays Pct Impact
1 -6.90 620.00 0.9889 75 310 .2419 1.6590
2 -109.80 504.00 0.7821 50 252 .1984 1.3605
3 -220.00 436.00 0.4954 25 218 .1147 0.7864
4 -99.00 486.00 0.7963 36 243 .1481 1.0159
5 16.20 450.00 1.0360 36 225 .1600 1.0971
6 -252.60 346.00 0.2699 9 173 .0520 0.3567
7 -130.40 258.00 0.4946 7 129 .0543 0.3721
8 -79.00 148.00 0.4662 4 74 .0541 0.3707
9 -58.80 66.00 0.1091 1 33 .0303 0.2078
10 25.20 32.00 1.7875 1 16 .0625 0.4286
11 -8.00 12.00 0.3333 1 6 .1667 1.1429
12 -2.00 2.00 0.0000 0 1 .0000 0.0000
Code:
By: Best E2 Gap
>=Min < Max Gain Bet Roi Wins Plays Pct Impact
-999.00 -10.00 -598.40 1530.00 0.6089 71 765 .0928 0.6364
-10.00 -9.00 43.80 146.00 1.3000 17 73 .2329 1.5969
-9.00 -8.00 -26.20 154.00 0.8299 11 77 .1429 0.9796
-8.00 -7.00 15.00 114.00 1.1316 8 57 .1404 0.9624
-7.00 -6.00 -94.20 142.00 0.3366 7 71 .0986 0.6761
-6.00 -5.00 -33.00 118.00 0.7203 9 59 .1525 1.0460
-5.00 -4.00 -52.40 138.00 0.6203 13 69 .1884 1.2919
-4.00 -3.00 -59.00 106.00 0.4434 8 53 .1509 1.0350
-3.00 -2.00 -48.20 126.00 0.6175 10 63 .1587 1.0884
-2.00 -1.00 -31.60 88.00 0.6409 8 44 .1818 1.2468
-1.00 0.00 -34.00 78.00 0.5641 8 39 .2051 1.4066
0.00 1.00 -40.40 190.00 0.7874 22 95 .2316 1.5880
1.00 2.00 -27.80 68.00 0.5912 8 34 .2353 1.6134
2.00 3.00 73.80 56.00 2.3179 6 28 .2143 1.4694
3.00 4.00 -1.40 68.00 0.9794 5 34 .1471 1.0084
4.00 5.00 -8.00 54.00 0.8519 9 27 .3333 2.2857
5.00 6.00 21.80 48.00 1.4542 8 24 .3333 2.2857
6.00 7.00 -15.80 30.00 0.4733 3 15 .2000 1.3714
7.00 8.00 6.70 20.00 1.3350 5 10 .5000 3.4286
8.00 999999.00 -15.80 86.00 0.8163 9 43 .2093 1.4352
Code:
By: Best E2 Num
>=Min < Max Gain Bet Roi Wins Plays Pct Impact
-999 30 -134.20 302.00 0.5556 18 151 .1192 0.8174
30 35 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0 0 .0000 0.0000
35 40 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0 0 .0000 0.0000
40 45 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0 0 .0000 0.0000
45 50 11.20 2.00 6.6000 1 1 1.0000 6.8571
50 55 -4.00 4.00 0.0000 0 2 .0000 0.0000
55 60 41.20 16.00 3.5750 1 8 .1250 0.8571
60 65 6.20 24.00 1.2583 1 12 .0833 0.5714
65 70 -37.80 72.00 0.4750 3 36 .0833 0.5714
70 75 -112.20 152.00 0.2618 5 76 .0658 0.4511
75 80 -120.60 208.00 0.4202 8 104 .0769 0.5275
80 85 -97.60 418.00 0.7665 19 209 .0909 0.6234
85 90 -142.00 496.00 0.7137 36 248 .1452 0.9954
90 95 -217.80 580.00 0.6245 45 290 .1552 1.0640
95 100 -38.00 482.00 0.9212 43 241 .1784 1.2235
100 105 -65.20 350.00 0.8137 37 175 .2114 1.4498
105 110 -21.90 186.00 0.8823 20 93 .2151 1.4747
110 115 19.60 56.00 1.3500 8 28 .2857 1.9592
115 120 -12.00 12.00 0.0000 0 6 .0000 0.0000
120 999999 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0 0 .0000 0.0000
And here is the same data broken out by Bris Q Speed Points:
Code:
By: Q Speed Points Rank
Rank Gain Bet Roi Wins Plays Pct Impact
1 -171.40 668.00 0.7434 67 334 .2006 1.3755
2 -85.30 540.00 0.8420 54 270 .2000 1.3714
3 -138.60 592.00 0.7659 44 296 .1486 1.0193
4 -148.60 454.00 0.6727 28 227 .1233 0.8458
5 -69.40 480.00 0.8554 30 240 .1250 0.8571
6 -180.40 330.00 0.4533 12 165 .0727 0.4987
7 -76.60 198.00 0.6131 5 99 .0505 0.3463
8 -18.80 52.00 0.6385 3 26 .1154 0.7912
9 -26.00 36.00 0.2778 2 18 .1111 0.7619
10 -6.00 6.00 0.0000 0 3 .0000 0.0000
11 -2.00 2.00 0.0000 0 1 .0000 0.0000
12 -2.00 2.00 0.0000 0 1 .0000 0.0000
Code:
By: Q Speed Points Gap
>=Min < Max Gain Bet Roi Wins Plays Pct Impact
-999 -8 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0 0 .0000 0.0000
-8 -7 -97.00 174.00 0.4425 8 87 .0920 0.6305
-7 -6 -75.80 164.00 0.5378 8 82 .0976 0.6690
-6 -5 -259.00 410.00 0.3683 17 205 .0829 0.5686
-5 -4 -50.80 402.00 0.8736 23 201 .1144 0.7846
-4 -3 41.40 432.00 1.0958 28 216 .1296 0.8889
-3 -2 -108.20 424.00 0.7448 32 212 .1509 1.0350
-2 -1 -108.40 380.00 0.7147 30 190 .1579 1.0827
-1 0 -95.90 306.00 0.6866 32 153 .2092 1.4342
0 1 -52.00 320.00 0.8375 29 160 .1813 1.2429
1 2 -72.80 166.00 0.5614 16 83 .1928 1.3219
2 3 -44.60 106.00 0.5792 11 53 .2075 1.4232
3 4 7.80 40.00 1.1950 6 20 .3000 2.0571
4 5 -5.00 26.00 0.8077 4 13 .3077 2.1099
5 6 -4.00 4.00 0.0000 0 2 .0000 0.0000
6 7 -0.80 6.00 0.8667 1 3 .3333 2.2857
7 8 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0 0 .0000 0.0000
8 9 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0 0 .0000 0.0000
9 10 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0 0 .0000 0.0000
10 999999 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0 0 .0000 0.0000
Code:
By: Q Speed Points Number
Q SpdPts Gain Bet Roi Wins Plays Pct Impact
0 -336.80 872.00 0.6138 40 436 .0917 0.6291
1 -67.20 260.00 0.7415 18 130 .1385 0.9495
2 -68.60 352.00 0.8051 22 176 .1250 0.8571
3 -105.20 400.00 0.7370 23 200 .1150 0.7886
4 -95.30 356.00 0.7323 32 178 .1798 1.2327
5 -83.80 424.00 0.8024 41 212 .1934 1.3261
6 -142.60 352.00 0.5949 30 176 .1705 1.1688
7 -16.60 180.00 0.9078 20 90 .2222 1.5238
8 -9.00 164.00 0.9451 19 82 .2317 1.5889
-jp
.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 05:22 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: massapequa park ny
Posts: 2,164
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by markgoldie
MNslappy:
Thanks for the info. I believe I read that PDF file before. The breakout of advantage figures that they use is very general, only looking at horses that have 7 or 8 Quirin points in a field where no one else has more than 5. In many cases, this could lead to only a 2-point advantage, for example, if the qualifying horse had 7 points and another horse had 5. What I was more interested in is say, a breakout where a horse had a 5-point advantage over the field, followed by a 4-point advantage, 3-point, etc.
fmolf: I have the Klein book as well and I do not bother to run his figures. However, I will say this: If you look at how he sets up his speed point scale and how the Quirin scale is set up, Klein has definitely made some advancements. Since Quirin points are currently considered the "Gold Standard" in t-bred racing, it makes some sense that Klein's points should be more accurate.
I subscribe to his website where he says that he has made some improvements to his general method since the publication of the book. I have used his numbers (not bothering to calculate them on my own, which as you say is time-consuming and difficult) and I have found his numbers to be highly accurate. Currently, though, I am not using pace advantage as my major means of handicapping, but I was wondering if anyone had info on points vs. pace figs, etc.
Mark
|
His ideas are worthwhile and make sense,regarding field size,lengths ahead. I just think the improvement is not great enough to use his methodology or his numbers.I prefer to look at the bris E1 & E2 numbers to get a feel for who the likely pacesetters will be.What is never taken into consideration is post position and whether a horse has the speed to clear the field from outside posts.This is best done using pace numbers or even raw fractional times.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 05:27 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 928
|
Jeff P:
Thanks for the obvious effort you put into that post. I think what it shows more than anything else is that the sample is too small to gather too much in the way of conclusions. Thus, you have proximate rankings which in many cases are drastically different from each other. This, no doubt is due to a high-priced winner or two which occurred in one rank and not in the other.
However, I take your vote seriously that pace figs are the better ROI indicator of a potential race winner. And I note that Partsnut disagrees.
Thanks.
Mark
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 05:56 PM
|
#12
|
DJ M.Walk
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Compton, CA!
Posts: 2,073
|
How are most looking at this? early speed points are for 1st call figures right? meaning which horse has the best 1st call early speed. 2f in sprints and 4f in routes. Would it not be better to look at the E1 and not the E2? E2 is the pace figure. Many horses may have low speed points, but in fact be better to the 2nd call while another horse could have high speed points, but fade to the 2nd call.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 05:57 PM
|
#13
|
AllAboutTheROE
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,411
|
I thought the Klein book had some interesting statistics. The biggest issue I had with it was that the only statistics he didn't provide were on the figures he made! Not exactly a ringing endorsement of their overall effectiveness or even improvement over the Quirin speed points.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 06:08 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,105
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by markgoldie
Jeff P:
Thanks for the obvious effort you put into that post. I think what it shows more than anything else is that the sample is too small to gather too much in the way of conclusions. Thus, you have proximate rankings which in many cases are drastically different from each other. This, no doubt is due to a high-priced winner or two which occurred in one rank and not in the other.
However, I take your vote seriously that pace figs are the better ROI indicator of a potential race winner. And I note that Partsnut disagrees.
Thanks.
Mark
|
Seems like I posted ROIs for a much larger sample when you were asking about this a month or so ago.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 06:52 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: massapequa park ny
Posts: 2,164
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBedo
I thought the Klein book had some interesting statistics. The biggest issue I had with it was that the only statistics he didn't provide were on the figures he made! Not exactly a ringing endorsement of their overall effectiveness or even improvement over the Quirin speed points.
|
i found in my experiment with his method that it pointed out a lot of speed and fade types.Did any one esle find this to be true?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|