Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > **TRIPLE CROWN TRAIL**


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 04-09-2019, 10:53 AM   #46
tjfla
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerard02 View Post
I won’t make my decisions until after the Arkansas Derby. Then, I’ll sit down and fill out the list. Maximum Security looks tops, so far. For those who have Stan Caris Book on the Triple Crown, remember, Rule 1 Times on 3/8ths and 1/8th final time are either/or. If a horse scores both, it’s a strong plus.

Last 29 races


26-29 Winners have met 1 of them AND 22-29 winner have met BOTH. Tacitus meets NEITHER which sucks
tjfla is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-09-2019, 11:25 AM   #47
PowerUpPaynter
Registered User
 
PowerUpPaynter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,362
I think the fraction hold less weight this year as most have been over 38 and over 13 with the exception of Sunland and Florida which the Florida derby the slow pace skews everything and Sunland might as well be asphalt...
PowerUpPaynter is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-09-2019, 01:20 PM   #48
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
I found where I left off, skipped 2011 since the winner came out of a synthetic track race. Not sure how to handle those. I'll work on it next week.

Then I did 2010. Top three were Ice Box, Dublin, Super Saver.

For some reason (maybe pre synthetics?), I then went to the beginning of my data, 2004:

Top 3: The Cliff's Edge, Lion Heart, Smarty Jones

The last one I did was 2005: Afleet Alex, Bellamy Road, Greeley's Galaxy

I'll finish the rest this week and post. The query is all set up but takes a bit to run it for each year and pair up with the horses that actually ran in the Derby.

I guess I'll just treat synth race like the others and see how it works out.
Here is what I have so far for 2019. Obviously we'll add horses after the Arkansas Derby. For now, I only used horses in the top 35 in Derby points that had a qualifying 1 1/8 mile race. The last fraction is from the TimeformUS Adjusted Times, equalized by track and for the track speed.

cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-09-2019, 02:02 PM   #49
Gerard02
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 222
Tax and Maximum Security are Family 1, so far. I put in a few numbers, but I don’t have the DRF speed figures and track variant for Rule 5. I have to go to Equibase to get the horses races at two for Rule 6. Right now, Maximum Security looks to score a high of 15 points. Looks like the others are short on Rule 3.
Gerard02 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-09-2019, 02:07 PM   #50
f2tornado
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjfla View Post
So who are the female families for this years horses? ANy Family 1
Maximum Security 1-n
Game Winner 1-x
Spinoff 1-n
Tax 1-tax
f2tornado is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-09-2019, 02:34 PM   #51
Gerard02
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 222
On your spreadsheet, 11 horses will qualify on Rule 1 at the Last 1/8th mile.
Gerard02 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-09-2019, 06:28 PM   #52
Blenheim
Race Player
 
Blenheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home of the brave.
Posts: 1,044
Time for TimeformUS

Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
Here is what I have so far for 2019. Obviously we'll add horses after the Arkansas Derby. For now, I only used horses in the top 35 in Derby points that had a qualifying 1 1/8 mile race. The last fraction is from the TimeformUS Adjusted Times, equalized by track and for the track speed.


Nice . . . clear and definitive. Thanks.

It is likely that the methodology and the formula[s] you use to derive your figures is proprietary. As best as you can, without disclosing means and methods, please define "equalized by track and for the track speed."
__________________
Nothing endures but change.
- Heraclitus 535-475 BC

Blenheim is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-09-2019, 11:03 PM   #53
jim michalak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 31
Thumbs up

c.j. will you be doing this analysis for the 2019 Kentucky derby? thanks.
jim michalak is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-10-2019, 01:27 AM   #54
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by jim michalak View Post
c.j. will you be doing this analysis for the 2019 Kentucky derby? thanks.
Yep, I'll update it as the field gets clearer and eventually finalizes.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-10-2019, 01:29 AM   #55
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blenheim View Post
Nice . . . clear and definitive. Thanks.

It is likely that the methodology and the formula[s] you use to derive your figures is proprietary. As best as you can, without disclosing means and methods, please define "equalized by track and for the track speed."
Nothing too complicated. Each track has a baseline for each distance and the finishing times are faster at some than others. So, I equalize that way, then the track variant for that specific day takes care of the track speed part.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-10-2019, 05:53 AM   #56
clicknow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 3,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjfla View Post
So who are the female families for this years horses? ANy Family 1
so that you can figure this stuff out on your own next time, or when you need to, just go to pedigree dot com and put in the horse names and you will see the "family" in the information on the horse. Hope this helps you

Last edited by clicknow; 04-10-2019 at 05:57 AM.
clicknow is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-10-2019, 07:32 AM   #57
tjfla
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by clicknow View Post
so that you can figure this stuff out on your own next time, or when you need to, just go to pedigree dot com and put in the horse names and you will see the "family" in the information on the horse. Hope this helps you

Thanks for info. Ya I dont mind looking it up just wasnt sure how to.
tjfla is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-10-2019, 09:43 AM   #58
Blenheim
Race Player
 
Blenheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home of the brave.
Posts: 1,044
Change in baseline over time . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
Nothing too complicated. Each track has a baseline for each distance and the finishing times are faster at some than others. So, I equalize that way, then the track variant for that specific day takes care of the track speed part.
So If Maximus runs a 36.23 LF at Gulfstream Park, what would his time be @ Santa Anita?

With respect to Santa Anita, the "baseline" and the breakdown deaths, have you see any change in the baseline at Santa Anita this year when compared to the same time last year? How does the baseline this year compare to the recent historic baseline average? Has the historic rainfall had an effect on the baseline?

What about the baseline[s] system wide. Are you seein' any patterns . . . or changes in the baseline @ GP; FG; OP; AQ; KEE and Churchill Downs? Are the track superintendents scrubbing speed out of or are they putting speed into these tracks, or are they pretty much the same?
__________________
Nothing endures but change.
- Heraclitus 535-475 BC


Last edited by Blenheim; 04-10-2019 at 09:46 AM. Reason: Added a word . . .
Blenheim is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-10-2019, 09:50 AM   #59
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blenheim View Post
So If Maximus runs a 36.23 LF at Gulfstream Park, what would his time be @ Santa Anita?

With respect to Santa Anita, the "baseline" and the breakdown deaths, have you see any change in the baseline at Santa Anita this year when compared to the same time last year? How does the baseline this year compare to the recent historic baseline average? Has the historic rainfall had an effect on the baseline?

What about the baseline[s] system wide. Are you seein' any patterns . . . or changes in the baseline @ GP; FG; OP; AQ; KEE and Churchill Downs? Are the track superintendents scrubbing speed out of or are they putting speed into these tracks, or are they pretty much the same?
Had to look it up...Gulfstream is 0.18 seconds faster for the closing 3f, before taking into account the daily track variant. Usually it just has to do with geometry. The easier the turns the faster the finishing time.

There hasn't been any change at Santa Anita. The times are slower, but the ratio has been about the same. People are talking about how slow it has been, but this actually happened last year as well where the track was made really slow. The change this year was all the rain to seemed to speed it back up.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-10-2019, 02:19 PM   #60
luisbe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 378
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
Here is what I have so far for 2019. Obviously we'll add horses after the Arkansas Derby. For now, I only used horses in the top 35 in Derby points that had a qualifying 1 1/8 mile race. The last fraction is from the TimeformUS Adjusted Times, equalized by track and for the track speed.

Where's Long Range Toddy?
luisbe is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.