Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 06-26-2017, 06:59 AM   #166
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by redlandb View Post
How about not having 30 minutes in between each fricking race. No "new" casual fan can spend 5 hours going to the track to watch all the card. Golf and baseball have the same problem. Our lives are too busy for the time commitment. You think I am full of BS? You try taking your kids to the "slower than hell" racetrack. I went to Lone Star today and left after 5 races, because I couldn't take it, and I love racing.
How about visiting the track's simulcast center...where races are shown from every track in the country, in rapid-fire fashion? Of all the "complaints" about the current "racetrack experience"...this "time in-between races" gripe is the one that I find totally incomprehensible. You DO know that full-card simulcasting has been offered nationwide for about 20 years now...right?
__________________
Live to play another day.
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-26-2017, 10:20 AM   #167
Jeff P
Registered User
 
Jeff P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
...You DO know that full-card simulcasting has been offered nationwide for about 20 years now...right?
Actually, without knowing it you've touched on yet another of California's many (self inflicted) problems:

Horsemen and track management refuse to allow actual full-card simulcasting.

They purposely limit the number of out of state races that can be bet at their brick and mortar simulcast centers.



-jp

.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com
Jeff P is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-26-2017, 10:49 AM   #168
ronsmac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by redlandb View Post
How about not having 30 minutes in between each fricking race. No "new" casual fan can spend 5 hours going to the track to watch all the card. Golf and baseball have the same problem. Our lives are too busy for the time commitment. You think I am full of BS? You try taking your kids to the "slower than hell" racetrack. I went to Lone Star today and left after 5 races, because I couldn't take it, and I love racing.
Try 6 hours at Saratoga. 11 or 12 race cards that take forever to run. Some of the races are 36 or 37 minutes apart.
ronsmac is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-26-2017, 05:53 PM   #169
HalvOnHorseracing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by redlandb View Post
How about not having 30 minutes in between each fricking race. No "new" casual fan can spend 5 hours going to the track to watch all the card. Golf and baseball have the same problem. Our lives are too busy for the time commitment. You think I am full of BS? You try taking your kids to the "slower than hell" racetrack. I went to Lone Star today and left after 5 races, because I couldn't take it, and I love racing.
The solution is not to have a lot less time between races, but to consume the time between races. One of the issues is that serious players want to watch the replays - that takes some time. A second issue is that serious players want to make sure the odds stabilize (or at least come close) before they bet. That takes some time. A third issue is that a number of people like to look at the horses pre-race to get a sense of their readiness.

Tracks like Belmont and Saratoga have a lot of expert commentary - I can tell you stories of people who hit races they wouldn't have hit if they hadn't been listening to Maggie Wolfendale. And whatever you think of Andy Serling, he is knowledgable and entertaining. I would agree that 36-37 minutes is too long, but on the other hand, they do keep prompt post times once they are set. When I am at a track like Saratoga, the time between races goes by pretty quickly. They always have entertainment going on, mainly music. Tracks either can't or won't invest in entertaining expert commentary or just entertainment. If you attend a live baseball game, there is always something entertaining between batters or innings. I'm never bored at a live baseball game.

It isn't that people are too busy for the time commitment, it is that racing isn't really a priority for them. How many of those same "busy" people will spend from noon to midnight on a Sunday watching pre-game shows, football games, and postgame shows?

A racetrack isn't really a venue for kids. You want kids to be entertained? Spend your five hours at Six Flags.
HalvOnHorseracing is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-26-2017, 06:33 PM   #170
AlsoEligible
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
How about visiting the track's simulcast center...where races are shown from every track in the country, in rapid-fire fashion? Of all the "complaints" about the current "racetrack experience"...this "time in-between races" gripe is the one that I find totally incomprehensible.
The guy was talking specifically about new/casual players, who aren't coming to the track to sit in a simulcast center watching fifteen different television screens. Nor would I recommend it, unless you want them to burn through their bankroll in less than 2 hours, leave discouraged, and never come back.

The new/casual crowd are coming to see live horses, watch live races, hear the roar of the crowds, all that jazz...and with the exception of a few tracks, there's not much to do when you're trying to kill 30 minutes between races. I don't really know how you fix that. But assuming they're not already die-hard players, telling them "well go inside and watch more racing!" isn't a good answer.

Quote:
You DO know that full-card simulcasting has been offered nationwide for about 20 years now...right?
Wrong. If you're going to be a dick about it, then you DO know that full-card simulcasting hasn't been offered in California for that same 20 years....right? Since this thread is specifically talking about California, I think that's relevant.
AlsoEligible is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-27-2017, 02:32 AM   #171
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlsoEligible View Post
The guy was talking specifically about new/casual players, who aren't coming to the track to sit in a simulcast center watching fifteen different television screens. Nor would I recommend it, unless you want them to burn through their bankroll in less than 2 hours, leave discouraged, and never come back.

The new/casual crowd are coming to see live horses, watch live races, hear the roar of the crowds, all that jazz...and with the exception of a few tracks, there's not much to do when you're trying to kill 30 minutes between races. I don't really know how you fix that. But assuming they're not already die-hard players, telling them "well go inside and watch more racing!" isn't a good answer.



Wrong. If you're going to be a dick about it, then you DO know that full-card simulcasting hasn't been offered in California for that same 20 years....right? Since this thread is specifically talking about California, I think that's relevant.
I beg to differ...the guy WASN'T "talking specifically about new/casual players". That's YOUR interpretation...because you needed something to support the lame point that you are trying to make. The guy stated that he HIMSELF found the waiting in-between races to be so excruciatingly BORING...that he HIMSELF could not bear to watch more than 5 live races. He said that he HIMSELF left the track after 5 races...even though he purportedly "loves the game". THAT'S why I suggested to him that he visit the simulcast center...as a cure to the "boredom" that live racing burdens him with.

You say that you wouldn't "recommend" that players bet out-of-town tracks while watching them on television screens. Do you "recommend" that these same players leave after 5 races...because they are excruciatingly BORED?

PS...

I know full well that this thread is about California...but the post that I responded to WASN'T. And THAT'S what I consider "relevant".
__________________
Live to play another day.
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-27-2017, 02:51 PM   #172
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
I think 20-25 minutes is the magic number. That's what many fair meets do (and they cater to casual fans).

But it's worth noting that the long downtime isn't the obvious deterrent to casual fans that people claim it is. The biggest racecards, the TC and Breeders' Cup, all of which draw tons of casual fans, all have much longer downtime, especially before the feature races. If fans are having a good time, getting drunk, spending time with friends, etc., I don't think they mind the downtime at all.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-08-2017, 08:23 AM   #173
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
Will be interviewed on WS Radio this morning (starts 8:00 AM PST). Will try to find out what time he comes on.

www.wsradio.com

Studio B
Andy Asaro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-09-2017, 11:56 AM   #174
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
Ritvo on in a couple minutes. My mistake about yesterday.

www.wsradio.com Studio B
Andy Asaro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-09-2017, 12:33 PM   #175
oughtoh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,033
Andy Thank you for posting the site. Listening to it now.
oughtoh is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-09-2017, 12:34 PM   #176
jimmyb
Registered User
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Baystater
Posts: 3,494
I detect a New England accent.
jimmyb is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-09-2017, 12:45 PM   #177
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyb View Post
I detect a New England accent.
he's from here and he married Kathy Petro.
lamboguy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-09-2017, 02:23 PM   #178
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by oughtoh View Post
Andy Thank you for posting the site. Listening to it now.
THX

Good job by both Ritvo and Felix. Sure he will be on again.
Andy Asaro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-09-2017, 04:45 PM   #179
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy View Post
he's from here and he married Kathy Petro.
Kathy's an excellent trainer who did a great job with Mucho Macho Man.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.