Today the new "GG" system will start to be tested for 100 plays at 5/2 or higher

[fmazur]

Will be watching. Best of luck

[Bill Cullen]

Originally Posted by barn32

Give the guy a break!

Thanks for your interjection on my behalf but I won't be learning new about the scientific method from this gentleman.

Testing a horse racing system is not the same as performing a physics experiment.

I'm not writing for a peer-reviewed journal. I'm trying to see if a horse racing system has some merit.

Do I have to accept some constraints on my experimental design or, if one prefers, my testing procedure? OF COURSE!

NOTICE THE GENTLEMAN NEVER OFFERED ANYTHING CONSTRUCTIVE IN A WAY TO IMPROVE MY TESTING PROCEDURE.

He just stated an observation not relevant for a reasonable test of a horse racing system.

Best,

Bill C

[Bill Cullen]

Originally Posted by fmazur

Will be watching. Best of luck

Thanks!

Bill C

[whodoyoulike]

Originally Posted by Bill Cullen

Today the new "GG" system will start to be tested for 100 plays at 5/2 or higher.

For 6-15-2017 the picks are:


1st race-church - #7

5th race - fair meadows- #4

7th race -Evangeline-#1

6th race - prairie-#2

5th race - lone star- #5


Good luck!

Bill C

Would it be too much to ask to include the horse's name because of scratches just using the # may be unclear or ambiguous. In case, one wanted to follow along.

[jimmyb]

Nice win in the first at Churchill

[green80]

for the sake of argument, just place a $2 bet on twinspires (if that is who you use) on all your plays and set the odds at 5/2 @0 min. Just count the ones that go in for a bet.

[green80]

I will say the picks were not all chalk, there was a 24/1 in there.