|
|
07-02-2021, 08:19 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 436
|
Off track scratches what can be done?
Have tracks ever thought about incentivizing purses to keep horses from scratching when it’s an off track or turf to dirt change ? It seems like a ton of money is lost in take out when up to half the fields scratch when it rains. Hundreds of thousands are lost on an off track card day. Increase the purse on these poor weather days so that owners and trainers don’t scratch. I’m sure I’m being a bit naive as there is probably more to this but from a financial standpoint the track has nothing to lose because the more entries the more they make.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 08:31 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 593
|
great idea sir. i think that they all have there own intrests in mind as if a track or racecino would care about custmers to them we are all a captive audince always have been always will be .but a very good wish indeed sir
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 09:06 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: st louis
Posts: 3,039
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by westernmassbob
Have tracks ever thought about incentivizing purses to keep horses from scratching when it’s an off track or turf to dirt change ? It seems like a ton of money is lost in take out when up to half the fields scratch when it rains. Hundreds of thousands are lost on an off track card day. Increase the purse on these poor weather days so that owners and trainers don’t scratch. I’m sure I’m being a bit naive as there is probably more to this but from a financial standpoint the track has nothing to lose because the more entries the more they make.
|
It doesn't matter what the purse is if the trainer thinks his horse is going to finish up the track they will still scratch.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 12:12 PM
|
#4
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,954
|
A lot of trainers scratch on off tracks to protect their horse.
It is a valid concern.
IMHO, while the scratches are inconvenient, the alternative is to force the horse to run.
Imagine the lawsuit demanding the track be responsible for forcing a horse to run in bad weather when the horse is badly injured.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 05:35 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
A lot of trainers scratch on off tracks to protect their horse.
It is a valid concern.
IMHO, while the scratches are inconvenient, the alternative is to force the horse to run.
Imagine the lawsuit demanding the track be responsible for forcing a horse to run in bad weather when the horse is badly injured.
|
Nobody said anything about forcing a horse to run. The point was to raise purses on off track racing days in hopes entrants would not scratch. I almost buy into scratching a horse due to safety concerns and bad weather however what’s that saying about the trainers who leave their horses in? A sloppy track is a sloppy track if things were that unsafe they would cancel the card. I have already talked to one trainer today about this idea I came up with. He said it would depend on the purse increase amount but it seems logical more horses would stay in. He also stated that he likes when half the field scratch because the purse stays the same with less competition.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 06:43 PM
|
#6
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,954
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by westernmassbob
Nobody said anything about forcing a horse to run. The point was to raise purses on off track racing days in hopes entrants would not scratch. I almost buy into scratching a horse due to safety concerns and bad weather however what’s that saying about the trainers who leave their horses in? A sloppy track is a sloppy track if things were that unsafe they would cancel the card. I have already talked to one trainer today about this idea I came up with. He said it would depend on the purse increase amount but it seems logical more horses would stay in. He also stated that he likes when half the field scratch because the purse stays the same with less competition.
|
A valid trainer stat is if a trainer decides to leave a horse in on a very wet track.
IOW, "worth the risk."
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 08:33 PM
|
#7
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,881
|
Race tracks need roofs
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 09:06 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 518
|
I don’t know too many bettors that are interested in betting an off track
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 10:20 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston Tx.
Posts: 3,130
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by westernmassbob
I have already talked to one trainer today about this idea I came up with. He said it would depend on the purse increase amount but it seems logical more horses would stay in.
|
At some tracks purses are already stupid high, but
__________________
Laboratory rats are susceptible to drug addiction, obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer.
|
|
|
07-02-2021, 10:51 PM
|
#10
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,954
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Turf_Monster
I don’t know too many bettors that are interested in betting an off track
|
I bet them.
With same success as fast.
|
|
|
07-03-2021, 12:01 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 915
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by westernmassbob
Have tracks ever thought about incentivizing purses to keep horses from scratching when it’s an off track or turf to dirt change ? It seems like a ton of money is lost in take out when up to half the fields scratch when it rains. Hundreds of thousands are lost on an off track card day. Increase the purse on these poor weather days so that owners and trainers don’t scratch. I’m sure I’m being a bit naive as there is probably more to this but from a financial standpoint the track has nothing to lose because the more entries the more they make.
|
This has already been tried. Article below was from 5 years ago, would have to say the experiment was worthwhile, but a flop far as keeping fields together:
https://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-rac...the-turf-races
|
|
|
07-03-2021, 08:39 AM
|
#12
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,954
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SG4
|
Thanks for that reminder.
|
|
|
07-03-2021, 10:15 AM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,705
|
the ones that stay are incentivized for higher probability of getting some of the purse
|
|
|
07-03-2021, 10:16 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 436
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SG4
|
Looks like the article was from 15 years ago not 5 which would explain me not remembering this. Thanks for the info. What made trying this a flop ? The article didn’t mention this being unsuccessful and the bonus carried over into the Saratoga meet that year.( I found another article ). No articles on whether it was successful or not. In any event at least someone tried that idea.
|
|
|
07-03-2021, 10:23 AM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 946
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
I bet them.
With same success as fast.
|
Me too.
None.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|