Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 04-20-2023, 06:07 PM   #76
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
This discussion is about the "Sartin Methodology"...so Sartin's "credibility" is fair game, IMO. If I am told by the moderators that I am off-topic...then I will stop my credibility references.
No one is telling you to stop, the question was is the methodology still used?
How is his credibility a factor?

There is a whole websute full of people using variations of it.

Ike implemented the US highway system based on Hitler's Autobon...should we not have done that?
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2023, 06:12 PM   #77
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
No one is telling you to stop, the question was is the methodology still used?
How is his credibility a factor?

There is a whole websute full of people using variations of it.

Ike implemented the US highway system based on Hitler's Autobon...should we not have done that?
Tom, the only reason I said what I said was because I didn’t see a real discussion developing here about the current “usefulness” of the Sartin methodology. This thread seemed to be stalling, and I thought I would liven it up a little bit.

If I sidetracked the thread unnecessarily…then I apologize.
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2023, 06:15 PM   #78
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranchwest View Post
Correct. And, 4 of 6 on a $52k P6. In race 6, I did not select the top Composite pace horse, which won paying $14.80. Big mistake on my part. And in race 7, my horse ran second. In my book, I was competitive in a big P6.

How many did you hit?
I won 7 out of 8 bets, for a $5,500 profit. But I admit that today was an “atypical” day.
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2023, 06:30 PM   #79
ranchwest
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: near Lone Star Park
Posts: 5,153
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
I won 7 out of 8 bets, for a $5,500 profit. But I admit that today was an “atypical” day.
I missed your post.
__________________
Ranch West
Equine Performance Analyst, Quick Grid Software
ranchwest is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2023, 06:34 PM   #80
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranchwest View Post
I missed your post.
What…and jinx myself?
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2023, 06:36 PM   #81
Speed Figure
DJ M.Walk
 
Speed Figure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Compton, CA!
Posts: 2,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
What…and jinx myself?
Did your picks come from Lights database?
Speed Figure is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2023, 06:48 PM   #82
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,569
In all seriousness, this is the toughest of all the gambling games...and it takes all we got if we are to compete, much less succeed at it. When I was younger I had strong handicapping opinions of my own...and I arrogantly gave out handicapping and betting advice. The older I get, the less firm my handicapping opinions become...and the less advice I like to give. IMO...there are no "teachers" in this game...we are all perpetual students. I take my hat off to all the studious horseplayers who burn the midnight oil in pursuit of the "key" to the mysteries of this often maddening game.
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2023, 08:39 PM   #83
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
In all seriousness, this is the toughest of all the gambling games...and it takes all we got if we are to compete, much less succeed at it. When I was younger I had strong handicapping opinions of my own...and I arrogantly gave out handicapping and betting advice. The older I get, the less firm my handicapping opinions become...and the less advice I like to give. IMO...there are no "teachers" in this game...we are all perpetual students. I take my hat off to all the studious horseplayers who burn the midnight oil in pursuit of the "key" to the mysteries of this often maddening game.
Not so bad, self control is everything. You can go into a casino sit watch races until your race comes up. No one says you have to bet 7 or 8 races, you don't have to bet even 1. I would sit in the Paris race book and bet 2 or 3 races a day $20 WPS, yhe majority of days I won over $250 before catching Al the Race Book Manager for my comped Paris Buffet for two and a line pass. Some says he would just punch them up for me at the start of his shift.
fast4522 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2023, 09:00 PM   #84
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522 View Post
Not so bad, self control is everything. You can go into a casino sit watch races until your race comes up. No one says you have to bet 7 or 8 races, you don't have to bet even 1. I would sit in the Paris race book and bet 2 or 3 races a day $20 WPS, yhe majority of days I won over $250 before catching Al the Race Book Manager for my comped Paris Buffet for two and a line pass. Some says he would just punch them up for me at the start of his shift.
Do you still go to the Paris race book now?
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2023, 10:20 PM   #85
Ted Craven
Registered User
 
Ted Craven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 978
A little late to this thread (been working on software and customer support ...). Yes, the Sartin Methodology is still around, in spades. I first met Howard in 1993 in Toronto (along with Jim Bradshaw and Tom Brohamer) and pretty much got on the bandwagon. Went to numerous seminars through the 90s: Saratoga, Baltimore, Las Vegas. Living in Canada, I never really got to know the personalities - just the tools. I became friendly with Jimmy and later with Tom Ainslie (Dick Carter), with whom I shared (and got valuable feedback on) some of my early programming efforts. I only really got to know Howard after he had retired due to ill health. A group of us shared with him our collective early results from RDSS, comparing it to his later software, and he was pleased someone was carrying on his effort. (I fully acknowledge Sartin's influence on Brohamer and thus on Ken Massa, thus HTR. And Sartin and Bradshaw's influence on Pizzolla, though he certainly doesn't like to elaborate on that. Certainly Dave Schwartz has acknowledged Doc's early influence.)

These days, with most of the old core gang gone or retired, it's up to the new gang: the students and students-of-students as mentors and teachers. RDSS is a pretty good tool, incorporating pretty much all the previous phases of the Sartin Methodology, plus some new stuff to try and stay ahead. Anyway, the utility of any handicapping software is in how it prepares you to make (or pass) wagers. Unless you LOVE the handicapping puzzle, that only takes you so far. I'd say the value of Sartin's Methodology and RDSS as an implementation of it is only as useful as how it points out those horses which when you find a way to build them into Win Dutches or Exacta and Doubles or other horizontals - gives you your profits on the day. Sometimes these horses are hiding in plain sight. IMO, the 'whales' have not killed the game yet - just made you have to work harder (and that's partly why the older software doesn't pay off as much as it used to).

One of the perks I get in being at the centre, like a hub connected to many spokes (users), is I hear lots of success stories and get lots (too many) of methods by which people use the tools. Some of these people have paid me annually for RDSS for 15 years now. Aside from the betting proofs people sometimes send and my acceptance of their results from knowing their character over years, I take it that people do not repeatedly renew their subscriptions for years for no reason. Some are weekend or seasonal 'warriors', some supplement their retirement pensions, some are children of parents who closed down the bars with Doc and Jimmy. A few are professionals or semi-pros.

So, still in use by lots of people. I'm not looking for customers but I won't say no to anyone who's interested and sincere. It is absolutely not a black box by any means and it is a lot of work: first finding out how to use the tools, then keeping models (successful users seem to keep at least minimal situational models of what factors to pay attention to in one way or another). I am deeply grateful to those on our website who daily post their Selections and recaps, and for some races do a more in depth analysis with screen shots, decisions made and wagers executed. These are the former students turned teachers.

If Doc was not a big bettor, in my mind he made up for it by being a good teacher - partly of handicapping process but more so of psychological self-image, self-actualization. Horse race handicapping may be a minor skill - but 'knowing thyself' unlocks the keys to the kingdom in life in general. His invocation in 'Pace Makes the Race' Edition 1 - 'Know thy Horse, Know thy Track, Know thy Self'. It helped me. But FWIW, at every seminar I attended, I always saw him going to and from the mutuel windows. I don't know his success rate or how much he bet. I think the story of buying tickets on all the horses is actually about Jim 'The Hat' Bradshaw, who freely confessed that desperation prior to meeting Sartin.

RDSS is highly interactive - chooses paceline/s or let's you choose and override. It exports CSV and Excel data for modeling. It has live tote odds including APIs to TwinSpires and AmWager. It imports BRIS Prime Power and ProfitLine figs and uses them in a high-level odds line. It has tools to do Bradshaw's Matchup technique, Brohamer's MPH velocity, % Median, Hambleton/Schmidt/et al's Total Pace Ratings, workout form analyses. If I have a couple more years left, I have a whole list of great stuff I want to add (integrated Modeling, full Exacta and Double tote grids, wager construction including hedging, dutching, wager upload, numerous usage videos, etc)

Anyone is welcomed to browse PaceandCap.com (or SartinMethodology.com) and check out the daily pre-race Selections and 'Races of Interest' Forums of post race analyses. These are there as learning tools, not freebies - it's part of the 'mission' of our site. If you once used the older software from Doc's days (Energy, Kgen, Synthesis, Validator, etc) - sometimes people post their picks and analyses using these too. No free RDSS trials any more, but 30 day money back on both RDSS software and TrackMaster data. Although you'll get a taste, you likely won't learn to use it in 30 days.

The Sartin Library contains almost everything Doc published, numerous seminar audios and some videos (including younger versions of some of us ...). If you thought highly of Jim Bradshaw's Matchup (a tough challenge, IMO) there's hundreds of pages of documentation on that, plus years of RichieP's work with with Jimmy himself. All free, all part of the service, as they say.

If you're going to Saratoga this year on Alabama Stakes weekend, feel free to join us. We've met there since 2008 (early on concurrent with the old PA 'Toga parties) and the first year taking a phone call with Howard. After a 3-year hiatus for the plague, we're back August 18-20 including the usual Friday night seminar. Could be a few really interesting speakers this year (including Bob Cochran and Bert Mayne if we're lucky), reviewing the latest in RDSS and handicapping the Saturday stakes. Plus pizza, beer, meeting the people you know from online.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ranchwest View Post
My software rates the horse. And, yes, to see how the race shapes up. To continue my process…

In keeping with Sartin, among my calculations are TE, the 7 primary factors, a composite of the 7 factors, VDC and Balance.
One thing - Ranchwest: congratulations on your new software! You've been a longtime member at P&C and I presume you've learned a lot there (and elsewhere, I know). A lot of the Sartin Factors are in the public domain (some explained in detail on our site) - but some are NOT in the public domain, they are proprietary. Specifically the V/DC factor (Velocity relative to Deceleration, or DC/V the converse label but same thing) - arguably one of Doc's and RDSS' signature factors. You have mentioned your Quick Grid software with Sartin Factors contains V/DC - but knowing what's in that formula, I highly doubt that people using what you name V/DC are getting the same thing as what Doc created and what is implemented in RDSS. I request you NOT use the term V/DC, lest people be confused that they don't need RDSS (or the older Validator software) to get that. In return, I promise not to use the term 'Quick Grid' in RDSS. Fair?

And congratulations to DanBoals and Ranchwest for some of their Aqueduct hits today. Everyone is welcomed to check the pre-race selections and post-race analyses of today Aqueduct 4/20 at P&C by one of our premier teacher/students (Lt1). A profitable day most days, in whatever few or many pools possible, is what we hope and work for.

So - yep, people still use the Sartin Methodology today. As Doc would say ' Good luck, good skill!'

Ted
__________________
RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™ "The Modern Sartin Methodology" . . . . www.rdss2.com




Last edited by Ted Craven; 04-20-2023 at 10:25 PM. Reason: spelling
Ted Craven is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-20-2023, 11:43 PM   #86
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,486
It has been years, I bet Al retired. We always got to sit in the same places, they reserved our names and taped them to the table. Doc Helfman sat middle of row 2 and I sat in row 3 just behind him one seat to the right not to view his head.
fast4522 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-21-2023, 08:43 AM   #87
shoelessjoe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 707
Ranchwest

Great job on your picks

Jeff
shoelessjoe is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-21-2023, 09:36 AM   #88
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
So…what do you do with such a horse…take his recent win and one of his subpar efforts, and average them out? If his last race was an 80 and the subpar efforts are a 60…you call this horse a 70? I used to do that, but it didn’t work for me. I found that the horse would either run back to the 80 in its next start, or revert back to the 60. It didn’t “compromise” and run the adjusted 70.

I don’t like “averaging” figures when I analyze horses because such a practice comes up with ratings that are wholly artificial, and don’t represent “reality”. Ten people are in a room, and I tell you that they weigh an average of 200 pounds. This creates an image in your mind, and you think that you know what these people will look like, bodywise. But the truth is that there might not be a 200 lb person in the entire place.
Some kind of combination doesn’t necessarily tell you how well he’s likely to run but using both races can give you a good estimate as to his winning chances.

I’ll make up some numbers to represent what I think is the correct type of thinking.

1. He’s 40% to run back to his good race and has a 50% chance of winning if he does. (20%)

2. He’s 60% to run back to one of his bad races or something in between and he has 10% chance of winning if he does. (6%)

I estimate he as a 26% chance of winning.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-21-2023, 09:53 AM   #89
ranchwest
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: near Lone Star Park
Posts: 5,153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Craven View Post


One thing - Ranchwest: congratulations on your new software! You've been a longtime member at P&C and I presume you've learned a lot there (and elsewhere, I know). A lot of the Sartin Factors are in the public domain (some explained in detail on our site) - but some are NOT in the public domain, they are proprietary. Specifically the V/DC factor (Velocity relative to Deceleration, or DC/V the converse label but same thing) - arguably one of Doc's and RDSS' signature factors. You have mentioned your Quick Grid software with Sartin Factors contains V/DC - but knowing what's in that formula, I highly doubt that people using what you name V/DC are getting the same thing as what Doc created and what is implemented in RDSS. I request you NOT use the term V/DC, lest people be confused that they don't need RDSS (or the older Validator software) to get that. In return, I promise not to use the term 'Quick Grid' in RDSS. Fair?

Ted
Thanks, Ted. My use of the term "VDC" was intended to convey in a generic sense that the number was velocity-to-deceleration. I was unaware that you used a proprietary formula and extended that proprietary nature to the name.

I certainly want to have everyone understand that Quick Grid is a unique product with unique calculations, so in the future I will refer to my velocity-to-deceleration number as "QDC", knowing that Quick Grid users will continue to enjoy its use under the new name.
__________________
Ranch West
Equine Performance Analyst, Quick Grid Software
ranchwest is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-21-2023, 09:55 AM   #90
ranchwest
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: near Lone Star Park
Posts: 5,153
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoelessjoe View Post
Ranchwest

Great job on your picks

Jeff
Thanks, Jeff!
__________________
Ranch West
Equine Performance Analyst, Quick Grid Software
ranchwest is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.