Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-06-2019, 03:45 PM   #9166
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox View Post
You're offering a logic here that I don't follow.
Choosing not to do something is not equivalent to not being able to do something, in the world I live in.
In Light's universe it is. Here is how his twisted logic works. God is love. God loves everyone unconditionally everywhere. Therefore, God cannot not intend to save everyone in this world. In other words, God can only intend to save and indeed actually save everyone in this world.

In Light's mind, love and justice are mutually exclusive attributes to God. It's one or the other but cannot be both.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 01-06-2019, 06:30 PM   #9167
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,890
Light has claimed two things: He has insisted that the nature of God's love is unconditional. So...no matter what -- no matter what anyone does, says or thinks, God never stops loving them and God will "save" them.

But Light now has more recently revealed to us that "Jesus understood the Law of Karma (at least with respect to Judas).

But Light really dug his heels and spurs into this (universal?) law of karma when he said this -- which is again worth repeating:

Quote:
That quote from Jesus is an extension of when he said "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” That wasn't a superficial saying, like "lets all be nice to each other". This is much deeper. Jesus is aware of the law of Karma and knows how this Divine principle of energy (spirit) works in a very practical way.
Of course Light, having extremely light knowledge of scripture, attributed a quote to Jesus which he never made. The principle of reaping what you sow finds it roots in the OT (cf. Jer 17:10; Job 4:8; Hos 10:12-13, Prov 22:8, etc.). But the central NT passage is found in what Paul taught the Galatians:

Gal 6:7-10
7 Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap. 8 For the one who sows to his own flesh shall from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit shall from the Spirit reap eternal life. 9 And let us not lose heart in doing good, for in due time we shall reap if we do not grow weary.
NASB

Now...to Light's credit, it appears he was quite correct about the profound depth to the "law of karma" (as he calls it). Paul certainly seemed to take this divine principle very seriously. So seriously, in fact, that Paul said that those who sow according to the Holy Spirit reap the great reward of eternal life -- a/k/a SALVATION. Conversely, those who sow according to their flesh (sinful nature) reap corruption. And there is no salvation in corruption -- only the judgment and the Second Death await these people.

So...this "law of karma" is actually a biblical teaching and should indeed by taken very seriously because one's eternal destiny hangs in the balance. This universal, God-given principle of life is actually consistent with the doctrines of eternal rewards and eternal punishment.

Conversely, this "law of karma" is not consistent with Light's idea that the nature of God's love is unconditional. Here's why: If God loves all people in the world in a distributive sense no matter what they think, say or do in life, and God's eternal intention is to save all people no matter what, and God would never leave or forsake any of his children in the world, then what practical spiritual purpose does the "law of karma" serve? What is the point to "karma"? Is God going to love the generous philanthropist more than the mass murderer? Is God going to reward the former while not rewarding the latter? But hasn't Light already argued that to treat one person differently from another would make God prejudicial? (For example, for God to choose to save one while choosing to condemn another?) Well, how would that argument differ in principle from Him choosing to reward one and punish another, which is the central idea behind the "law of karma"? In Light's world, because God loves all people and loves them equally, then from that kind of love it's necessary that this God of unconditional love also treat all people equally. And right here is the thorny crux to Mr. Light's latest dilemma.

There can be no such thing as the "law of karma" with Light's idea of his god of love. There is not only no reason for the law to exist, but if it exists, then this would contradict Light's notion of the true nature of his god's love, which is purely unconditional. And unconditional means no strings attached. In the eyes of Light's god, the generous philanthropist and the mass murder or child molester or Buddhist holy man or whatever -- are all on equal footing.

Bottom line here: Light is going to have choose between his love and devotion to two contradictory doctrines, since both doctrines violate the Law of Noncontradiction. He's going to have to choose between his love for the "law of karma" or his love for the idea of what he thinks is the true nature of God's love, i.e. unconditional. Both cannot logically co-exist -- at least not peacefully.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 01:25 AM   #9168
Light
Veteran
 
Light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox View Post
You're offering a logic here that I don't follow.
Choosing not to do something is not equivalent to not being able to do something, in the world I live in.
According to Box, God won't save certain sinners, period. We all know that he can but according to Box, he NEVER will. Well if you can save them but NEVER will that is the equivalent of not being able to save them. Apparently God can't get past his own ego or rules to save them according to Box.

That leaves the door wide open for the God of sin or "the Devil" to win. This makes God weaker than the Devil in this area, and all the Devil would have to do is seduce people into going where God won't go and he has leverage over God.

This makes God subservient to the Devil's game which is ludicrous and the reason it is ludicrous is because the premise that God will NEVER save certain people is ludicrous to begin with.

Christianity is the only religion in the world that believes "Hell" is permanent and eternal. All other religions that believe in "Hell" see it as temporary. In other words God saves them after they have paid their dues.

The reason I personally do not believe in a permanent Hell is, can you imagine if you are in Heaven and a loved one you know is in Hell. Heaven would not be Heaven anymore. I would be tormented. All people in Hell have someone who loves them somewhere in Heaven. If I, a mere human being would be tormented by a loved one in Hell, how can God, who has infinite more love than I and for that person, be OK with that? I mean there are people who love other people so much they would trade places with them. This is the power of love and this concept of God's "conditional love" and "vengeance" goes against the very nature of who God is and undermines him. Even dogs have unconditional love.
Light is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 01:59 AM   #9169
Greyfox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Light View Post
According to Box, God won't save certain sinners, period. We all know that he can but according to Box, he NEVER will. Well if you can save them but NEVER will that is the equivalent of not being able to save them.
Sorry.
In my world, not doing something that you might be able to do and/or not able to do something, are completely separate concepts.
The consequences may be the same. That doesn't make the intent, actions, or lack thereof equivalent, as far as I understand the English language.
To think otherwise, is outside my grasp of what I consider to be logic.
Greyfox is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 02:04 AM   #9170
Greyfox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Light View Post

The reason I personally do not believe in a permanent Hell is, can you imagine if you are in Heaven and a loved one you know is in Hell. Heaven would not be Heaven anymore. I would be tormented.
That is a very good point for all of us to think about.
Greyfox is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 01:46 PM   #9171
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Light View Post
According to Box, God won't save certain sinners, period. We all know that he can but according to Box, he NEVER will. Well if you can save them but NEVER will that is the equivalent of not being able to save them. Apparently God can't get past his own ego or rules to save them according to Box.

That leaves the door wide open for the God of sin or "the Devil" to win. This makes God weaker than the Devil in this area, and all the Devil would have to do is seduce people into going where God won't go and he has leverage over God.

This makes God subservient to the Devil's game which is ludicrous and the reason it is ludicrous is because the premise that God will NEVER save certain people is ludicrous to begin with.

Christianity is the only religion in the world that believes "Hell" is permanent and eternal. All other religions that believe in "Hell" see it as temporary. In other words God saves them after they have paid their dues.

The reason I personally do not believe in a permanent Hell is, can you imagine if you are in Heaven and a loved one you know is in Hell. Heaven would not be Heaven anymore. I would be tormented. All people in Hell have someone who loves them somewhere in Heaven. If I, a mere human being would be tormented by a loved one in Hell, how can God, who has infinite more love than I and for that person, be OK with that? I mean there are people who love other people so much they would trade places with them. This is the power of love and this concept of God's "conditional love" and "vengeance" goes against the very nature of who God is and undermines him. Even dogs have unconditional love.
Really? "Even dogs have unconditional love"? Try mistreating or abusing a dog over time and see how much he loves you.

As far as God losing out to the devil if all are not saved, this doesn't make any sense. Again...the question is: Did God ever intend in eternity to save each and every sinner? We find the very clear cut answer to this important very early in Genesis -- right after the Fall in the Garden. In fact, a few years or so ago, I wrote a post or two on the Fall to prove the doctrine of unconditional election. Suffice it to say for the moment, though, to quote the one specific passage that proves that God sovereignly reconciled Eve to Himself, while rejecting Adam. Note very carefully in the passage to whom God is speaking. He's speaking to the "Serpent" -- Satan -- God's arch enemy.

Gen 3:14-15
14 And the Lord God said to the serpent,

"Because you have done this,
Cursed are you more than all cattle,
And more than every beast of the field;
On your belly shall you go,
And dust shall you eat
All the days of your life;
15 And I will put enmity
Between you and the woman,
And between your seed and her seed;
He shall bruise you on the head,
And you shall bruise him on the heel."

NASB

The only logical inference that can be made from v.15 is that since God put enmity (in a sense declared war between Eve and the devil), then this can only mean that God removed the enmity between Eve and Himself that was caused by Eve's sin (rebellion against God's revealed will). This removal of the enmity (rebellion against God's revealed will) means God reconciled Eve to Himself. He restored Eve to Himself. This must be so, otherwise Eve would be an enemy of God and Satan. Eve, in essence, would have hated Good and Evil her entire life. And that's impossible;for all men hate the one while loving the other. This principle is taught, for example, by Jesus in Mat 6:24; Lk 16:13). All people in this world have a master. Their Master is either the Lord Jesus Christ or the devil. There is no third option.

And we know it's all people because the passage above tells us. The text doesn't stop with just Eve and the devil; for both Eve and devil have SEED. And God extends this promise of spiritual "warfare" to both their future seed. The primary "seed" of the woman in the text is God who came in the flesh -- who came in the person of his Son Jesus Christ. (Jesus is the one who will "bruise" the Serpent's head under the feet of holy seed, i.e.his saints, cf. Rom 16:20.) But by extension, it also includes God's seed, i.e.all those in Christ. The spiritual seed in the OT are all those who by faith looked forward to the coming of their Redeemer and Savior to make atonement for their sin. And in the NT, it is the saints who by faith look back at the person, life and work of Christ on the Cross AND look forward to his coming again to complete His redemptive work, which is the redemption of all the saints' bodies at the Resurrection. These are called the sons of God (Mat 5:9; Lk 20:36; Rom 8:14, 19; Gal 3:26) And we know Jesus is fully on board with this understanding because he told the Pharisees that they were the sons ("seed") of the Devil (Jn 8:38, 41, 44) See also Mat 13:38; Jn 6:70; Act 13:10; 1Jn 3:8-12.

Now that we have biblically established who the two seeds are in the above passage, all that remains is the question of Adam. What about Adam? In case, Mr. Light, you haven't noticed, Adam is conspicuously absent in v. 15. This can only mean that Adam was not reconciled to God. God did not decree that Adam and the devil would be lifelong enemies, as He did with Eve. Therefore, Adam's sin kept him permanently separated and alienated from God -- a lifelong enemy of God.

So much for your twisted logic that concluded that if God did not intend to save everyone, this somehow equates to a victory to God's arch enemy the Devil! How do you come up with such contorted, perverse, blasphemous ideas? While this one passage and all the supporting texts I cited is sufficient to crush your carnal reasoning, I will take my argument one step further but very briefly.

There is a principle in scripture I call the Accommodation Principle. It runs throughout scripture. We must remember, first and foremost, that God is not HUMAN. He doesn't think like fallen human beings do. Nor does he act the way fallen human beings do (cf. Isa 55:8-12). You should do yourself a huge solid by committing the entire passage to memory! And note very carefully that whatever God has decreed, it will come to past. And one of the things he has decreed in eternity is the ultimate defeat of his arch enemy -- the devil.

What is this Accommodation Principle? Very simple. God often grants to his fallen image bearers (angels and humans alike) the sinful desires of their heart[/b]. He grants to the worldly wise -- to those wise in their own eyes -- the deepest desires of their own evil hearts to show them that ultimately His seeming foolishness (in doing so) is infinitely wiser than their carnal, corrupt, worldly wisdom, and that God is infinitely more powerful than anyone's heart. Here are but a few of the major biblical examples:

1. Satan's Fall. Instead of God casting Satan and all the other fallen angels straight into Hell after they sinned, God granted Satan's desire. We can easily infer what Lucifer's desire was from Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28, which record his fall. He wanted to be like God. He wanted to share in God's glory. He wanted to share God's throne in his heavenly kingdom. So, how did the "foolishness of God" respond to Lucifer's sinful desires of his heart? He gave the devil the kingdom he so much desired -- just not the one in heaven. Instead, He gave him this world. Satan is the ruler and god of this world. Scripture teaches that this entire world lies in the power of the Evil One! Yet, at the same time, the bible also assures us that God will reclaim what is His. Satan will be defeated and ultimately be tossed into hell for all eternity.

2. God chose Israel to be his kingdom here on earth. God's intention was to rule over the nation directly -- But what happened? Israel had different desires. The people wanted an earthly king to rule over them. The Israelites wanted to be just like the other surrounding nations! This brought great distress to Samuel the prophet, but God told Samuel that ultimately they weren't rejecting him per se, but God's rule! So, God granted the Israelites the dark desires of their heart by instituting an earthly monarchy -- just like the other nations. And we see how well that turned out for Israel. Yet, as Paul teaches in Romans all true Israelites will be saved by God. The forces of darkness are defeated again.

3. Satan's attack on Job. Many, if not most of us, have at least a passing familiarity with the story. Satan thought he knew Job's heart better than God did. He told God that the only reason Job was so faithful to Him is because Job was living the good life. God had granted so much prosperity and health to Job and his family, that God practically "bribed" the man to live righteously. Satan, went on to tell God that if Job's great wealth and family were taken away, Job would curse God. When that failed, Satan told God that if his health was taken away, he would deny Him. God accommodated Satan twice by granting his requests with limits set by God. Again, score another victory by God and another defeat for the devil, as we know how that story turned out, as well.

4. The Crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Israel didn't want a spiritual savior. The spiritual, religious leaders of the nation feared for their own authority; for they viewed Jesus as a genuine threat to their "moral" authority. The leaders wanted to preserve their leadership and authority instead of submitting to their Messiah's authority So...God gave them the desires of their wicked hearts. He allowed Israel to deliver up Jesus to the Romans to be murdered. Once again, we see how that turned out for Israel and how it will turn out going forward.

This post is already too long. So, I'll stop here and in the next post we will take up your personal concern for your loved ones who are suffering in the lake of fire for all eternity, while you're basking in God's glory in His perfect, pristine, sinless paradise. Of course, Mr. Light, if you are so deeply concerned about the eternal destiny of your loved ones, you would become a true believer and spend all your spare time evangelizing your loved ones. You would have the attitude of Paul -- that perhaps "you" would be able to save some (Rom 11:14; 1Cor 9:22). But be that as it may, I will show you from scripture that your fears are totally groundless and entirely unrealistic.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 02:06 PM   #9172
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Really? "Even dogs have unconditional love"? Try mistreating or abusing a dog over time and see how much he loves you.
Is that what God is up to? Mistreating and abusing mankind over time to see how much we love him?
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 02:15 PM   #9173
TJDave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,034
Missed opportunity

What...no dyslexic jokes?
__________________
All I needed in life I learned from Gary Larson.
TJDave is online now  
Old 01-07-2019, 02:18 PM   #9174
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
3. Satan's attack on Job.
In the original text it is not Satan but "the accuser."
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 02:21 PM   #9175
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
This post is already too long.
Slow day today huh?
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 02:25 PM   #9176
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
Is that what God is up to? Mistreating and abusing mankind over time to see how much we love him?
No, you have it backwards as usual. Mankind if "mistreating and abusing" God; for all men are in open rebellion to God.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 02:26 PM   #9177
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
In the original text it is not Satan but "the accuser."
They're one and the same. Get your hands on multiple translations; for I know you can't read ancient Hebrew.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 02:28 PM   #9178
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
Slow day today huh?
At least I'm responding to an actual post, whereas lately you've been talking to yourself with your tomes.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline  
Old 01-07-2019, 02:44 PM   #9179
TJDave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor View Post
In the original text it is not Satan but "the accuser."
Partially correct. The original text uses the Hebrew word/s pronounced ha-saatan meaning “the accuser.”
__________________
All I needed in life I learned from Gary Larson.

Last edited by TJDave; 01-07-2019 at 02:46 PM.
TJDave is online now  
Old 01-07-2019, 03:05 PM   #9180
Actor
Librocubicularist
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJDave View Post
Partially correct. The original text uses the Hebrew word/s pronounced ha-saatan meaning “the accuser.”
__________________
Sapere aude
Actor is offline  
Closed Thread





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Which horse do you like most
Dornoch - 67.74%
42 Votes
Track Phantom - 32.26%
20 Votes
Total Votes: 62
This poll is closed.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.